Comments on: Spare a thought for the poor ol’ fascists.

By: Hamza

Hamza — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:27:01 +0000

Paul, thanks for your comment. I don’t think there are any Marxists left in the Labour Party are there? I agree that liberal teaching methods haven’t done much for us, but the shift started in the 60’s and the Tories have always been more or less complicit in it.

Are muslim teachers less agreeable to you than born-again or fundamentalist Christian teachers?

By: Paul Wright

Paul Wright — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:21:34 +0000

I would rather have a BNP member teach my children than some of the marxist Labour supporters who have ruined teaching in the UK.

I would also rather have a BNP member teach my children than a Muslim teacher…………………………

By: catherine

catherine — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:24:52 +0000

re your comment on nursing… the medical prof is one of the few that can bow out of the abortion procedure… effectively under the abortion act there needs to be two signatures, and any doctor can refuse to sign if he objects, (but he has to refer) even though british law does not recognise the rights of a child till it it ‘fully extruded and independant’ of the mother. this results in there being geographical ‘hotspots’ where doctors can go to practice and not be expected to partake.. eg huddersfield, leaving any woman needing an abortion to travel elsewhere, and be totally talked down to by the medical prof in the process.
ergo… would we want emplyment hotspots where the BNP could live and work, and those of ethnic minorities/homosexuals/AND WOMEN were not afforded the protection they are leaglly due to?
i wouldnt let a BNP member teach my child. I have a plasterer at the mo who has just told me (after hearing me rant about the BNP for a week) that he is a fully paid up member… i almost sacked him on the spot… (lawfully… see aslef v UK echr) then thought no, i can make a difference here – ive been slowly talking to him, and ive got him so info on redwatch, which he had no idea about, and is disgusted.
education is the way forward… not violence and threats, but knowledge and compassion for these damaged people.
=) spread the multi-cultural love xx

By: Ed

Ed — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:37:46 +0000

“..joining a political party is an active choice, and fascism is not within the realm of reasonable or legitimate political choices as far as I am concerned.”

It was thinking like this that led to the majority of the most evil regimes of the 20th Century such as Stalin’s USSR, Mao Zedong’s China, Pol Pot’s Cambodia etc that brutally killed millions and tens of millions of people. Once someone’s political choices are defined as “not legitimate” it is only a logical step to killing them.

In essence this is no different from Stalin’s communism. The target is dismissed out of hand as a “fascist”, “rightist”, “bourgeois nationalist” etc and such hysteria whipped up that it becomes only logical to “liquidate” them.

By: Hamza

Hamza — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:30:01 +0000

“Ask yourself a different question: would you want your child to be taught by a fascist?”

No, I absolutely wouldn’t. But how do you know someone is a fascist? Especially if they are not allowed to advertise the fact by joining the BNP.

And I’m sure there’s plenty of other types of people I wouldn’t want teaching my children – but I don’t necessarily get that choice unless I “home ed”. So who should we send our “nasty people” lists to?

By: voltairespriest

voltairespriest — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:03:01 +0000

I don’t actually care what happens to their jobs, personally. Ask yourself a different question: would you want your child to be taught by a fascist? Your elderly relatives to be cared for by one? One to be entrusted with performing surgery on you perhaps?

Shove the f*****s on the dole as far as I am concerned: joining a political party is an active choice, and fascism is not within the realm of reasonable or legitimate political choices as far as I am concerned.

By: Hamza

Hamza — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:06:35 +0000

Thanks for your comment, it is much appreciated.

I don’t doubt that many of the BNP members are nasty pieces of work with odious beliefs, but my point is how does barring them from employment help? If someone leaves the party because their work forces them to, it’s not going change their beliefs. And how do you bar the nasty pieces of work with odious beliefs who aren’t members of the BNP? Maybe we need some way to weed out people with those beliefs at the interview stage – employment eugenics anyone?

By: Julaybib Ayoub

Julaybib Ayoub — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:47:20 +0000

“would a Christian be barred from working in a hospital becaue she believes that abortion is wrong?”

I think some people are treating BNP affiliation as a liberal issue, instead of focusing on what the BNP actually stand for and believe. This is an organisation whose core membership includes supporters of Hitler and eugenics, holocaust deniers, convicted violent criminals and racists. These are not people with unpopular opinions – BNP members finance and endorse fascism. And I for one have very little sympathy for fascists or their friends.